<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel>
  <title>Colorado Medical Cannabis - recently updated</title>
  <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/</link>
  <description>Pages on colorado-medical-cannabis.org, newest updates first. Update times come from each page's commit history.</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 20:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <item>
    <title>Colorado marijuana enforcement: request for producer input</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/producer-review/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/producer-review/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>We believe Colorado marijuana regulators have violated specific public-trust and official-misconduct statutes, detailed here for industry input before submission to authorities.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Developing stories</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Stories we publish before they&#x27;re finished, because the things they cover aren&#x27;t finished either. Every claim marked by what supports it, updated as facts land.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Colorado&#x27;s marijuana testing overhaul: one maze, three layers</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Colorado rewrote its marijuana testing rules effective January 2026, is rewriting them again, and watched a statutory rewrite die. We&#x27;re mapping the maze from the primary documents, matrix by matrix.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Your medicine changed federal drug schedules in April. Almost nobody told you.</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-rescheduling/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-rescheduling/</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 05:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>On April 28, 2026, marijuana under state medical licenses moved from federal Schedule I to Schedule III. What that actually changes for a Colorado patient, what it leaves undecided (including the legal status of the jar in your hand), and the bigger rescheduling decision still in progress.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The fine is a business expense: Colorado&#x27;s cannabis testing enforcement gap</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/enforcement/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/enforcement/</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 05:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Everyone at Colorado&#x27;s cannabis testing forum agrees sample cheating happens. Industry itself asked the state to revoke licenses for it, and the state agreed revocation belongs on the table. The fines on record run $15,000 to $23,750, and the year produced no enforcement proposal.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Where are the reports? The state promised its testing results in writing</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/where-are-the-reports/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/where-are-the-reports/</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 05:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Colorado committed, in writing, to publish its shelf-testing results on a schedule: a summary about 30 days after the program ended, a detailed report about 90 days after. Both deadlines passed without a document. Going forward, this site will ask its members to file records requests when public data goes missing without a stated reason.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Who made that decision? A public program changed its reporting and nobody would say who chose</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/who-made-that-decision/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/who-made-that-decision/</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 05:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Colorado&#x27;s shelf-testing program consolidated its promised reporting into a single end-of-program document. Asked directly who made that decision, nobody at the public forum could name an author, the chair moved on, and no recording since has supplied an answer. This site will ask its members to request the paper trail.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Flower potency: why the THC number is shaky, and what to read instead</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/patient-guides/flower-potency/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/patient-guides/flower-potency/</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 05:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>A batch of flower does not have one THC number; it has a range, by biology. Why the percent on the jar is the least reliable thing printed there, and what actually predicts the experience: the ratio, the terpenes, the freshness.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The cannabis aroma map: a tasting guide for your nose</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/aroma-map/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/aroma-map/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>A 112-term aroma vocabulary for cannabis flower, arranged as a tasting map, built the way wine and whisky trained their tasters, and grown by the reviews our readers send.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Patient guides</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/patient-guides/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/patient-guides/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Practical cannabis information with visible evidence labels, linked sources, and a firm boundary against personalized medical advice.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>About this site</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/about/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/about/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>A public editorial layer for Colorado medical cannabis patients, caregivers, and people considering cannabis for a medical condition.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Colorado Medical Cannabis</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Patient information and clear reporting on the Colorado rules that shape access and choice, read from primary sources.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Field notes: five years of cannabis for chronic pain</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/patient-guides/cannabis-for-pain-field-notes/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/patient-guides/cannabis-for-pain-field-notes/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>An informal guide from our staff reviewer&#x27;s five years using cannabis for spinal stenosis. The mistakes, the dosing lessons, and what nobody at the counter tells you.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The flower blind spot: the worst-labeled product is the least-checked one</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/flower-blind-spot/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/flower-blind-spot/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Two independent datasets say flower has the worst label record of any cannabis product. A full year after Colorado launched off-the-shelf surveillance testing, flower has never been tested once. Why the blind spot happened, what it costs, and how to read the results when they finally land.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The entourage effect: promising idea, growing evidence, and what patients notice</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/patient-guides/entourage-effect/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/patient-guides/entourage-effect/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Where the term came from, what the research actually shows, why that research keeps missing the plant, and the buffering effect one patient keeps noticing in fresh, high-terpene flower.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The September 12, 2025 forum: the surveillance program locks its design, and the fight over transparency begins</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2025-09-12/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2025-09-12/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>The forum finalized shelf-surveillance for an October launch (test types, collection SOPs, the industry bulletin) and split hard over how fast and how fully results should reach the public.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The September 4 forum is coming: what would you ask Colorado&#x27;s testing regulators?</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2026-09-04/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2026-09-04/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>The Science &amp; Policy Forum meets September 4, 2026. We&#x27;ll be there and we&#x27;ll cover the recording. Send us the questions you&#x27;d want asked about testing, labels, and the state&#x27;s surveillance program.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why we read the papers ourselves: a flagship journal, one scatter plot, and the difference</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/why-we-read-the-papers/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/why-we-read-the-papers/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Peer review is a signal, not a certification. A worked example (a prestige-journal paper whose evidence dissolves under one scatter plot) and what this site does instead.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Is the label true? Every number Colorado has, in one place</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/is-the-label-true/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/is-the-label-true/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 07:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Two years, two independent instruments, one direction: every safety test the state has run came back clean, and the potency numbers consumers dose by are not reliably true. The complete label-accuracy record, each figure with its scope, in one page.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The building: the watchdog&#x27;s lab is thirty years old and failing in cascade</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/the-building/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/the-building/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 05:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>In January a rooftop fan exploded at Colorado&#x27;s state cannabis reference lab. Three of the four other air handlers had failing bearings. Metals testing stopped for lack of exhaust ventilation, and flower surveillance slipped most of a year. The people are doing the work; the facility is the unacceptable part.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Agent access and interpretation terms</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/agent-access/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/agent-access/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>The machine-readable page pattern, seven interpretation rules, and their visible HTML enforcement status.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Colorado regulations</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/colorado-regulations/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/colorado-regulations/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>News and rule changes translated into their practical effects on Colorado cannabis consumers and medical patients.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ryan&#x27;s Law in Colorado: who will actually allow it?</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/sb-26-007-ryans-law/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/sb-26-007-ryans-law/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>A Colorado law lets health facilities allow medical cannabis for terminally ill patients, and requires none of them to. We&#x27;re researching what happens next.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Science &amp; Policy Forum archive: a year of testing debates, meeting by meeting</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Machine transcripts and AI-drafted summaries of Colorado&#x27;s cannabis Science &amp; Policy Forum meetings, from the run-up to the January 2026 testing rules through the first year under them.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The August 7 testing meeting: what got settled, what got raised, what&#x27;s still open</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/august-7-forum/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/august-7-forum/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Colorado&#x27;s Science &amp; Policy Forum met August 7, 2026. Third-party sampling is off the forum&#x27;s table, the state&#x27;s own labs proposed tighter method rules, and one central question about lab consistency got the answer &quot;I don&#x27;t think we have an answer to that.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Colorado&#x27;s new testing rules: what changed, and what it means at the counter</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/what-changed/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/what-changed/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>The testing rules that took effect January 5, 2026, in plain language: what the state changed, which businesses each change touches, and what it means for the products you buy.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Who this hits: Colorado&#x27;s testing decisions read from six different chairs</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/who-it-affects/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/who-it-affects/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>The same testing decisions and non-decisions land differently on a patient, a recreational buyer, a grower, a lab, an extractor and a dispensary. What each one should take from them.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Who actually pays for cannabis testing, and how little a decent state lab would cost</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/who-pays-for-testing/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/marijuana-testing-overhaul/who-pays-for-testing/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Colorado collected $236 million in cannabis taxes in 2025 while its state lab&#x27;s air handlers failed one by one. The testing system&#x27;s real costs are hidden in the supply chain (paid by consumers and failed businesses), and the facility that anchors it all is the cheapest part of the system.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The August 1, 2025 forum: flower labels fail a statewide test, and the surveillance program takes shape</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2025-08-01/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2025-08-01/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>A researcher&#x27;s 281-product study found concentrate labels honest and flower labels wrong more than half the time; the state then walked through its shelf-surveillance design, after restarting the disrupted meeting in locked-down webinar mode.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The November 7, 2025 forum: edibles pass, the hard tests slip to 2026, and the trust problem gets said out loud</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2025-11-07/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2025-11-07/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Phase one&#x27;s edible microbials all passed; pesticide and solvent methods needed more validation time, pushing flower surveillance to 2026; and the year&#x27;s bluntest exchange put the interlab trust crisis on the record.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The January 9 forum: a year of testing fights gets scheduled, an edibles report nears, and a fan explodes at the state lab</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2026-01-09/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2026-01-09/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Four days after Colorado&#x27;s new testing rules took effect, the Science &amp; Policy Forum set its 2026 agenda (interlab consistency and new analytes), heard the first surveillance results were drafted, and learned an exploded air handler could slow the program.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The February 6 forum: a risk score for new tests, and the third-party sampling fight arrives early</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2026-02-06/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2026-02-06/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>A stakeholder-built risk worksheet for adding analytes, the revelation that Colorado had (and repealed) third-party sampling rules a decade ago, and half of recent enforcement actions tied to sample adulteration.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The March 6 forum: third-party sampling meets its price tag, and the analyte worksheet drops its scores</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2026-03-06/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2026-03-06/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Cost estimates from 10% to triple, testimony from labs that operate both regimes, the enforcement-is-the-variable lesson from California, and a leaner evidence worksheet piloted on chromium and fusarium mycotoxins.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The April 3 forum: how the state actually checks its labs, the demand for a true value, and the edibles results slip out</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2026-04-03/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2026-04-03/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>The proficiency-testing program explained down to its robust statistics, a manufacturer&#x27;s case that single-point pass/fail rules don&#x27;t match the statistical reality, surveillance pushed to fall, and the first edibles results disclosed under pressure.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The June 12 forum: third-party sampling dies in the room, and the edibles results finally land (clean product, unreliable labels)</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2026-06-12/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2026-06-12/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>The forum declined consensus on mandatory third-party sample collection; the surveillance program&#x27;s edible results showed every safety test passing while barely half the samples matched their own labels.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The July 10 forum: fixing first-party sampling instead, and the coin-flip result</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2026-07-10/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/2026-07-10/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>With third-party collection dead, the forum pivoted to strengthening self-collection rules. And the surveillance data comparison landed hard: samples that passed a licensed lab passed the state&#x27;s retest only about half the time.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>What kept coming back: a year of Colorado&#x27;s cannabis testing debates, read whole</title>
    <link>https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/patterns/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://colorado-medical-cannabis.org/developing-stories/science-policy-forum/patterns/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Ten meetings, one year, five questions that never got answered. The recurring threads and per-seat pain points across the Science &amp; Policy Forum from August 2025 through August 2026, drawn from our machine transcripts of every published recording.</description>
  </item>
</channel></rss>
