Colorado Medical Cannabis

Before you enter

Are you 21 or older?

This website contains information about cannabis. By entering, you affirm that you are at least 21 years old.

Your answer is stored only in this browser. This site provides educational information, not medical advice.

The Science & Policy Forum archive: a year of testing debates, meeting by meeting

Machine transcripts and AI-drafted summaries of Colorado's cannabis Science & Policy Forum meetings, from the run-up to the January 2026 testing rules through the first year under them.

A public document within a Colorado outline connects to people, prices, retail access, and local communities.

Developing story: this page is updated as verified facts land. What we could not verify is marked as unverified, and published and updated times come from this page's commit history.

The last twelve months in one read: What kept coming back: a year of Colorado's cannabis testing debates, read whole: the questions raised meeting after meeting without resolution, and where the pain consistently sits for each group in the room. If you deal with these regulations, start there; the per-meeting summaries below are its evidence.

The Science & Policy Forum is the standing working group where Colorado's Marijuana Enforcement Division and the state health department sit down with labs, industry, and public-health stakeholders to hash out cannabis testing science: roughly monthly, on the record, with recordings published by the Division. It's where the state's testing rules get argued about before and after they become rules.

This archive covers the forum year surrounding the biggest of those rule changes: the testing revisions that took effect January 5, 2026. The meetings before that date show the rules being shaped; the meetings after show the system digesting them. Read in order, they're the story of how a regulation actually gets made and lived with, including the questions that keep coming back without answers.

How this archive is made

We download the Division's published recording of each meeting, transcribe it locally with a speech-recognition model, and draft a summary of what was brought up, what was nailed down, and what was left open. Each summary page carries an AI Generated Summary banner until our editor has reviewed it. The banner is the honest label, and the recording, not our summary, is the source of record. Timestamps in each summary let you check any claim against the Division's own video.

The meetings

UPCOMING MEETING: September 4, 2026. The forum's next session, announced by the Division; registration link pending on their public-engagement page. What would you ask the regulators? Send us your questions. We'll be there, and we'll cover the recording here once it's published.

Summaries are added as they're drafted, newest at the top. Start at the bottom to read the year in order. The Division's public-engagement page lists no recording for some months; where that's the case we say so and claim nothing more.

Where this connects

The testing-rule threads that run through these meetings are tracked as their own developing story: Colorado's marijuana testing overhaul: the rules in force, the rulemaking in flight, and who each decision hits.